Rhodophyllus haeuslerianus (Henn.) E. Horak

NZOR Identifier: e6beff20-e05e-424e-ace8-109bcbadeb2f

Status

Synonym of Entoloma haeuslerianum (Henn.) Blanco-Dios (NZOR Concept Id e596a075-6f7e-4e92-a039-7ed03a9adbcc)

Classification

kingdom
Fungi
subkingdom
Dikarya
phylum
Basidiomycota
subphylum
Agaricomycotina
class
Agaricomycetes
subclass
Agaricomycetidae
order
Agaricales
suborder
Tricholomatineae
family
Entolomataceae
genus
Rhodophyllus
species
Rhodophyllus haeuslerianus (Henn.) E. Horak

Providers

Scientific Name

Authority
(Henn.) E. Horak
Rank
species
Published in
Horak, E. 1971: A contribution towards the revision of the Agaricales (Fungi) from New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 9(3): 403-462
Micro-reference (page)
429
Year
1971
Basionym
Eccilia haeusleriana Henn.
Original orthography
hauslerianus
Governing Code
ICBN
Is Recombination
Yes

Taxon Concept

NZOR Concept Id
b3698ee7-89f7-4e11-894c-d0db6985fc1d
According to
NZFUNGI (2012-) New Zealand Fungi Names - Name Based Concepts
Has Parent
Rhodophyllus (In use by NZOR)
Preferred Name
Entoloma haeuslerianum (Henn.) Blanco-Dios (In use by NZOR) }

Taxon Concept

NZOR Concept Id
205eb9b0-16fe-4b64-bcf0-fd462ef09c92
According to
Segedin, B.P.; Pennycook, S.R. 2001: A nomenclatural checklist of agarics, boletes, and related secotioid and gasteromycetous fungi recorded from New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 39(2): 285-348
Preferred Name
Eccilia haeusleriana Henn. }

Taxon Concept

NZOR Concept Id
fa889a97-620a-4172-a69d-6562ec6151e9
According to
Horak, E. 1971: A contribution towards the revision of the Agaricales (Fungi) from New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 9(3): 403-462

Taxon Concept

NZOR Concept Id
d87e9699-21dd-4be0-a963-86bc1f8211dd
According to
Horak, E. 1980: Entoloma (Agaricales) in Indomalaya and Australasia.Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia 65.

Taxon Concept

NZOR Concept Id
648c7002-38f6-4f4f-b66d-bced194fc705
According to
Segedin, B.P. 1987: An annotated checklist of agarics and boleti recorded from New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 25(2): 185-215

No subordinate taxa

No vernacular applications

Provide feedback for this name